Posted in community, culture, education, PLC, protocols, tagged CFG Assumptions, CFG critical friends group, collaborate, protocols, Teachers on July 27, 2012|
Leave a Comment »
When meeting as a Critical Friends Group (CFG) it is essential to surface assumptions. Assumptions about the work, about each other. Assumptions about learning and the learners. Last July in Alpharetta, GA we started our 5 day institute experience by exploring our working assumptions for the following days.
- Our work products are better when we collaborate.
- Protocols offer equity in voice as well as efficiency.
- All 3 jobs: participant, presenter and facilitator require practise in order to improve.
- Creating and sustaining collaborative cultures is rigorous and intentional
At times when dialogue is stunted or a group is stuck it may be entirely necessary to voice your assumption in order to move beyond a hump. When it is time for the facilitator to allow time for Q and A it is important to understand that Q and A stands for Questions and Assumptions. If we had the answers we wouldn’t have the questions. Coming together “beyond the place of right and wrong” makes for rich and fertile learning ground. Rumi continued “there is a field, meet me there.” At the heart of the CFG is equity of learning for presenter, facilitator and participant in a place where we can see things together.
We are all unique, but we are not alone. I can see things you can not see and you can see things i can not. We must try to see what is there together. M. Holquist
This poster was hanging in the space that we were using in the media centre of Alpharetta High School. Apropos of our CFG work I thought. You?
Read Full Post »
During my 4 day institute on Critical Friends Groups in Alpharetta, Georgia we continually referred to our “gingerbread man”. On day one we started our “Opening Moves” with the construction of gingerbread men that carried a number of our notions, perspectives, thoughts into our intense 4 days of learning work. Each area on the cardboard cut out represented thoughts that we had.
- The head was a place to write things that are annoyances to us or things that “drove us crazy.”
- The chest or heart was a place to locate those things that you loved.
- The stomach area was for things that gave you indigestion.
- The hands were a place to indicate something you endeavoured to let go of during the institute and something you brought to the table.
- Each leg represented a place to write a reason you came to the institute and something you hope to take away with you.
During each day of the institute participants took their “gingy” in hand and reported out about one of the items on the surface.
On day one I shared that “something I love as a father is the noises Gavin makes (all be them rude sometimes) when he is really enjoying food that I prepare for him, especially when I cook him homemade tomato sauce for his penne.
Out of that sharing came this audioboo when I returned home and made Gav a tomato sandwich:
; flashvars=”mp3=http%3A%2F%2Faudioboo.fm%2Fboos%2F884642-the-noises-gavin-makes-when-he-likes-my-food.mp3%3Fsource%3Dwordpress&mp3Author=Cowpernicus&mp3LinkURL=http%3A%2F%2Faudioboo.fm%2Fboos%2F884642-the-noises-gavin-makes-when-he-likes-my-food&mp3Time=03.46pm+14+Jul+2012&mp3Title=The+noises+Gavin+makes+when+he+likes+my+food.” width=”400″ height=”160″ allowFullScreen=”true” wmode=”transparent”]
Read Full Post »